Environment mapsNewsVivid maps

Human Climate Niche Mapped

This post may contain affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Homo sapiens, like every other organism on our planet, has its own niche. A comfortable temperature for humans ranges from 17°C to 24°C (62.6 to 75.2 °F). Within that temperature span, the ideal, especially for young and older people, is 22 to 23 °C (72 to 73°F), but it could be some degrees lower with high humidity and some degrees higher with low humidity. Mild heat strain starts at about 23°C (73.4°F) with high humidity or about 27°C (80.6°F) with low humidity. At medium humidity, heat strain is considered to be severe at 32°C (89.6°F), very severe at 36°C (96.8°F), and extreme at temperatures higher than 40°C (104°F), which can be lethal. Of course, people bear much hotter or colder weather, but there is a limit. Almost everybody finds city temperatures above 30 °C (86 °F) unacceptably hot. And people feel that days which don’t get above 17 °C (63 °F) are unpleasantly cold, at least for a leisure that’s not focussed on winter sports. Both cold and hot temperatures may have short-term effects on heart rate and blood pressure. Some studies even show that people who grew up in regions with more mild temperatures closer to 22 °C (71.6°F) scored higher on personality factors linked to socialization and stability (agreeableness, emotional stability, conscientiousness) and personal growth and plasticity (extraversion and openness to experience).

Regarding the climatic zones, the most significant number of days with comfortable temperatures for human life is found mainly in the subtropics. But climatic conditions comfortable for the human body are not the only condition for the progress of human societies. Historically, the emergence of progressive societies is confined to areas with climatic conditions that are comfortable not only for human habitation but also for the growth and habitat of economically important plants and animals. Therefore, I would say that the article below refers not only to the niche of Homo sapiens alone but rather to the niche of a community of humans, domesticated animals, and plants as a kind of “super-organism,” which, for example, can be called Homo agricultures.

Dutch research ecologist Marten Scheffer and his colleagues at the Santa Fe Institute and Wageningen University researched the history of global temperature, human population, and land-use estimates from the mid-Holocene period, starting about 6 thousand years ago to current times.

Researchers discovered that people, crops, and livestock had concentrated heavily in a narrow range of comparatively restricted climate conditions. This range referred to in the analysis as the “human climate niche,” has remained primarily unchanging since 6,000 years ago.

These 6,000 years of human history reveal how society thrives when we remain within it and the instability that occurs when it is moved out of these climatic zones.

According to the research, the optimum conditions for human civilization to flourish have a mean annual temperature of 11 to 15° C (51.8 to 59 °F). The ideal average temperature for national economic success is 13°C (55.4°F). Overall economic productivity is non-linear in temperature for all nations, with productivity culminating at an annual average temperature of 13 °C and decreasing strongly at higher temperatures.

The contemporary production of crops and livestock is mainly limited to the same climatic conditions, and the exact optimum has been seen for agricultural and nonagricultural economic output of nations through analyses of year-to-year variation.

The Optimum conditions for human society to flourish

For mapping territories with mean annual temperature from 11°C to 15°C (51.8 to 59 °F), I used the raster image of the bioclimatic variable of Annual Mean Temperature (BIO1). According to the map globally, the Earth’s surface area with optimal conditions for human society to flourish is about 7.7 million square kilometers or 3,0 million square miles.

Worl map of territories with optimal conditions for human Society
View the full-size map (+cities)
Countries by area of land with optimal conditions for human society to flourish

The wealthiest country in the world with the highest GDP, the United States, has the largest area with the optimum conditions for human society to flourish. Second place in the ranking of countries with optimal climatic conditions for flourishing humanity is the world’s second economy–China.

Area of land with optimal conditions for human Society (11° to 15°C) in square kilometers by country
View the full-size map

The top 10 countries with the most significant area with the optimum conditions for human society to flourish

RankCountryArea in sq kmArea in sq mi
1United States1,602,350618,671
2China1,390,310536,802
3Argentina512,823198,002
4Iran350,084135,168
5Australia308,044118,936
6Uzbekistan276,460106,742
7Spain268,074103,504
8Turkey247,14295,422
9France238,61492,129
10Kazakhstan231,36389,330

Below is the map of the percentage of land areas with optimal conditions for humanity to flourish by country, according to the research of Marten Scheffer and his colleagues.

Percentage of land areas with optimal conditions for human society to flourish by country

Uzbekistan, the birthplace of one of the world’s ancient civilizations, has the highest percentage of land areas with the optimum conditions for human society to flourish.

Percentage of land area with optimal conditions for human Society (11° to 15°C) by country
View the full-size map

The top 10 countries with the highest percentage of land areas with the optimum conditions for human society to flourish

RankCountryPercentage
1Uzbekistan65
2Azerbaijan64
3South Korea59
4Italy55
5Monaco55
6Spain54
7Bulgaria50
8Greece49
9Lesotho48
10France43
Land area with optimal conditions for human society to flourish per capita by country

Below is the map of a land area with optimal conditions for human society to flourish per capita and the map of countries by the number of people per square kilometer of land area with optimal climatic conditions for human society to flourish.

Full-size maps you can find here and here.

The top 10 countries with the largest land areas with the optimum conditions for human society to flourish per capita

RankCountryArea in hectares per person
1Croatia5.3
2Monaco3.4
3Turkmenistan2.9
4Italy2.8
5New Zealand2.6
6Kazakhstan1.5
7Australia1.5
8Argentina1.3
9Uzbekistan1.0
10Chile1.0

Even nowadays, despite the many technological advances that have helped us create comfortable conditions even in the earth’s most inhospitable regions, the climate continues to influence the development of civilization, as it did thousands of years ago. But as the climate changes, the territories that fit within the human climate niche will also change.

Further warming will harm the economies of many countries, especially those that are densely populated. Such countries as India, Indonesia, Brazil, and Nigeria are already much warmer, representing the impact of climate change on their economic growth will be even greater. Nowadays, about 0.8% of the planet’s surface experiences mean annual temperatures above 29° Celsius (84.2°F), especially in the Sahara region of Africa. However, with forecasted rises in global average surface temperatures, this area is expected to enlarge significantly to cover almost 19% of the global land. According to some research, a result of climate change that shifts climatic zones would leave 1 – 3 billion people outside the climate conditions that have nurtured human society to date. This would not be a massive problem if few people lived in that part of the world, but it is one of the world’s fastest-growing areas.

According to the researchers, the human climate niche is projected to shift remarkably to higher latitudes. So at present, the United Kingdom and Germany are cooler than 13°C, meaning their economies may improve slightly as temperatures increase.

The maps below show how the optimum conditions for human society to flourish will change by the end of the 21st century

The Optimum conditions for human society to flourish in 2100

By 2100, Europe’s climate, except for the southern part, will be even more comfortable. The zone with the most comfortable climate in North America will be mainly located along the border between the United States and Canada.

For creating the map below, I used future climate data from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) for the general circulation model MIROC6 and climate projection ssp585.

Territories with optimal conditions for human Society (11° to 15°C) in 2100
View the full-size map (+cities)

Globally, the Earth’s surface area with optimal conditions for human society to flourish will increase by 32% from 7,738,067 to 11,390,271 square kilometers (from 2,987,684 to 4,397,808 sq mi).

Countries by area of land with optimal conditions for human society to flourish in 2100

By the end of the 21st century, the United States, China, Russia, and Kazakhstan will have the most expansive territories with a comfortable climate for life and economic development.

World map of countries by Area of Land with Optimal Conditions for Human Society to Flourish in 2100
View the full-size map

The top 10 countries with the most significant area with the optimum conditions for human society to flourish in 2100

RankCountryArea in sq kmArea in sq mi
1United States2,421,176934,821
2China1,639,005632,823
3Russia1,151,595444,633
4Kazakhstan1,018,858393,383
5Argentina453,201174,982
6Canada447,391172,739
7Ukraine414,358159,985
8Germany346,801133,902
9Poland308,660119,174
10Mongolia252,96197,669
Percentage of land areas with optimal conditions for human society to flourish by country in 2100

Climatic changes will also benefit northern, central, and eastern Europe. The territories of some European countries will be almost entirely in the zone with optimal climatic conditions for human society to flourish.

Percentage of land area with optimal conditions for human Society (11° to 15°C) by country in 2100
View the full-size map

The top 10 countries with the highest percentage of land areas with the optimum conditions for human society to flourish in 2100

RankCountryPercentage
1Netherlands100
2Estonia99
3Lithuania98
4Poland96
5Belarus95
6Germany94
7Denmark93
8Ireland91
9Latvia91
10Czech Republic90
Land area with optimal conditions for human society to flourish per capita by country in 2100

The UN forecasts that world population growth will slow considerably for the 21st century, coming near to its peak at 10.9 billion by 2100. The most populous countries in 2100 will still be China and India. There will be 1.4 billion people in each of these countries.

Unfortunately, the climate of the most densely populated countries in Asia and Africa will become less comfortable for living and economic development.

Below is the map of a land area with optimal conditions for human society to flourish per capita and the map of countries by the number of people per square kilometer of land area with optimal conditions for human society to flourish by the end of the 21st century created using UN data on the projected population in 2100.

Full-size maps you can find here and here.

The sparsely populated countries of northern and eastern Europe will benefit from the increase in the average annual temperature.

The top 10 countries with the largest land areas with the optimum conditions for human society to flourish per capita in 2100

RankCountriesArea in hectares per person
1Latvia6.2
2Greenland5.7
3Estonia5.3
4Mongolia4.8
5Lithuania4.3
6Belarus3.2
7Kazakhstan3.0
8New Zealand2.1
9Ukraine2.0
10Montenegro1.6

Expected Net Area Change of Land with Optimal Conditions for Human Society to Flourish per capita to 2100

In absolute numbers, Russia, the U.S., and Kazakhstan will benefit most from climate change, while Iran, Uzbekistan, Spain, and Australia will lose the most.

If we consider the change in the area of territories with the most comfortable climatic conditions per capita, the European countries will primarily benefit.

Below are the maps that show the expected net area change of land with optimal conditions for human society to flourish in total (map on the left) and per capita (map on the right) by 2100.

Full-size maps: 1, 2

Top 10 countries with the highest and lowest growth of an area of land with optimal conditions for human society in hectares by 2100

RankCountryChange in an area in hectares by 2100RankCountryChange in an area in hectares by 2100
1Russia+108 964 0001Iran-28 917 900
2United States+81 882 6002Uzbekistan-26 883 600
3Kazakhstan+78 749 5003Spain-23 903 100
4Canada+44 739 1004Australia-20 661 700
5Ukraine+40 049 3005South Africa-16 861 100
6Germany+34 677 1006Mexico-16 004 600
7Poland+30 866 0007Turkmenistan-14 018 300
8Mongolia+25 296 1008Italy-13 912 400
9China+24 869 5009Algeria-7 454 600
10Belarus+20 771 80010Morocco-6 434 800

Top 10 countries with the highest and lowest growth of an area of land with optimal conditions for human society in hectares per person by 2100

RankCountryChange in an area in hectares per person by 2100RankCountryChange in an area in hectares per person by 2100
1Latvia+6.21Croatia-5.0
2Greenland+5.72Monaco-3.4
3Estonia+5.33Turkmenistan-2.9
4Mongolia+4.84Italy-2.7
5Lithuania+4.35Australia-1.3
6Belarus+3.26Uzbekistan-1.0
7Ukraine+1.97Colombia-0.9
8Kazakhstan+1.58Lebanon-0.6
9Poland+1.39Spain-0.5
10Montenegro+1.210Azerbaijan-0.5

According to the researchers, business-as-usual climate change scenario, the geographical position of this temperature niche is forecasted to shift more over the coming 50 years than it has shifted since 6000 BP. As a result, climate change’s effect will massively increase global income inequality and reshape the global economy by decreasing average global incomes by roughly 23% by 2100. Populations will not simply track the shifting climate; adaptation in situ may address some challenges, and many other factors affect migration decisions.

5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Funnx
1 year ago

The fact that the “zone” for wonderful human living would basically cover all of central and most of the southern Nordics is astonishing to me.

КВАСОВАР
КВАСОВАР
1 year ago
Greetings from Russia. Dear author of this article is wrong. The countries of Central Asia, such as Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, cannot be Optimal conditions for the prosperity of human society. because the climate is sharply continental. Winters are very cold, down to -50 degrees Celsius, and summers are very hot, up to +40 degrees. This is a very bad climate. The lack of forests and low productivity of arable land confirms this.
КВАСОВАР
КВАСОВАР
1 year ago
Reply to  Alex
Almaty is located in the foothills of the Tien Shan. which somewhat softens its climate. but most of kazakhstan is open steppe, a city like astana where the average winter temperature is -15C. and very hot summers. The low population density confirms that the land in the past could not feed a large number of people. Also, low rainfall does not contribute to the development of agriculture. The amount of precipitation in Kazakhstan is 4 times less than in Western Europe.
КВАСОВАР
КВАСОВАР
1 year ago
Reply to  Alex
I wrote about Astana. The average temperature there in winter is -15C.
КВАСОВАР
КВАСОВАР
1 year ago
Reply to  Alex
I'm sorry, but the features of the sharply continental climate are large temperature differences, both annual and daytime, nightly. Uzbekistan is no exception here. There are small places in the foothills where there is some water, people live there, Samarkand is built in such a place. Most of Uzbekistan is a lifeless territory, where the sun shines 365 days a year, there is little rain and it is blown from all sides.
КВАСОВАР
КВАСОВАР
1 year ago
Reply to  Alex

ok, I’ll go the other way. a quick glance at Google map is enough to make sure that the territory of Central Asia is sands and steppes, where there is sparse vegetation, poor wildlife. little moisture. How can a person live comfortably in such a climate? The Caspian Sea is not deep, it warms up quickly in summer and cools down quickly in winter without giving thermoregulation, as does the ocean, and deeper seas that store heat.

Alex E
Alex E
1 year ago

If you take Samarkand, the climate there is dry subtropics, quite comfortable for human life.
http://samarkand-guide.narod.ru/klima.html
http://elib.rshu.ru/files_books/pdf/img-125123223.pdf 

Zoze Tamad
Zoze Tamad
1 year ago

Just interesting the habitable areas for humans in theory are not actually the most densely populated. Americans are moving to those areas south of the habitable zone. Argentines stick to Buenos Aires. The most habitable areas of France and Spain are some the emptiest in those countries. It seems like Italians, Koreans, and Japanese settle where they’re “supposed to”.

Alfred de Jager
1 year ago
Reply to  Alex

Sure, but any adaptation will cost you energy, time and heatth issues. So in the end of the day you will be competed out.

Alfred de Jager
1 year ago

The authors did not consider 2 important factors that limit human living at northern latitudes. The first one is daylight, its variability at high latitude both in summer and winter limits regular human life. The winter lack of daylight above 55 degrees latitude is known to cause depression. Finally also plants limit their growth due to day light limits. Harvests at northern latitudes are limited to maximum 1 per year. Related to this issue is the lack of fertile soils at northern latitudes. Weathering processes made them acid and the recent glaciations made them not fully developed. Soil development takes in the order of 1000 years using natural processes. Artificialy speeded up can be done but requires large amounts of energy and is unlikely to be profitable.

Kokos
Kokos
1 year ago

Forget about Western Europe. They will experience terrible problems with major flooding events. Many lands are simply below water level. This is not taken into account in the study. Proximity to the Sea isnt not in their benefit.

Michel Walsh
Michel Walsh
5 months ago

The average is not a particularly good criterion. North-Dakota may have an interesting average, but the extreme continental temperatures without mountains to make a barrier to polar wind in winter makes it poorly populated for a good reason.

18
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x