Poverty in the United States Mapped
This post may contain affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
The United States, despite being one of the world’s wealthiest nations, continues to grapple with significant poverty challenges that vary dramatically by region, state, and demographic group. Let’s look at how poverty manifests across different parts of the country and what factors drive these geographic disparities.
The Geography of American Poverty
The distribution of poverty across the United States reveals stark regional patterns. According to recent Census Bureau data analyzed by Visual Capitalist, the South consistently shows higher poverty rates compared to other regions.
The Southern states paint a particularly concerning picture. New Mexico leads with an 18.2% poverty rate, followed closely by Mississippi (17.8%) and Louisiana (16.9%). In contrast, states like New Hampshire and Utah show much lower rates at 7.1%, while Minnesota maintains a 7.7% poverty rate.
This geographic distribution affects various communities differently. Native American reservations experience some of the nation’s highest poverty rates, with seven of the eleven poorest counties encompassing Lakota Sioux reservations. Urban centers in states like New Jersey show pockets of intense poverty despite the state’s overall lower poverty rate, while rural communities across all regions face unique challenges in accessing resources and economic opportunities.
Why the South Bears a Heavier Burden
The concentration of poverty in the South isn’t random. Several factors contribute to this regional disparity:
- Rural Prevalence: The South has extensive rural areas, which historically face greater economic challenges than urban centers
- Educational Attainment: Lower levels of educational completion impact job opportunities and earning potential
- Economic Structure: Many Southern states have been slower to diversify their economies beyond traditional industries
Perhaps most striking is the persistence of poverty in Southern counties. Research shows that about one-fifth of Southern counties have maintained poverty rates above 20% for three decades, representing over 80% of all persistently poor counties nationwide.
Beyond the Mainland: Poverty in U.S. Territories
While mainland poverty statistics are concerning, U.S. territories face even more severe challenges. American Samoa, for instance, reports poverty rates comparable to developing nations, with a staggering 65% of its population living in poverty as of 2017. Puerto Rico struggles with a 43.1% poverty rate, highlighting the economic disparities between mainland states and territories.
Changing Patterns and Response Efforts
The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered poverty patterns across the country. While 2019 saw some of the lowest poverty levels on record, the pandemic’s economic impact pushed approximately eight million Americans into poverty between May and October 2020. This shift prompted new approaches to poverty reduction, including enhanced unemployment benefits and direct assistance programs.
Currently, various regional economic development programs target persistently poor areas through multiple strategies. These include investments in education and workforce development, infrastructure improvements to connect isolated communities with economic opportunities, and targeted support for rural development. However, progress remains slow, and many communities continue to struggle with intergenerational poverty.
Recent initiatives have focused on building economic resilience in vulnerable communities through job training programs, small business support, and improved access to healthcare and education. While these efforts show promise, the geographic disparities in poverty rates suggest that more targeted, region-specific approaches may be necessary to address the unique challenges faced by different parts of the country.
Want to learn more about poverty in the U.S.? Check out the following books.
The cost of living in the South is very low.
Poverty is an arbitrary government measure that has nothing to do with affordability
Judged by the prices in the Supermarkets of basic necessities, this is simply not true. It is actually the result of government keeping folk below the poverty line as policy, whilst the rich get richer.
I’ve lived in the South.
I have family in Hawaii, California, Oregon, Nevada
.
The difference in the cost of living is dramatic.
An average house in Mississippi would cost $129,000.
In Hawaii, nearly $800,000.
Yet, food and clothing are only about 20% higher than Mississippi.
Housing asserts the greatest pressure on poverty, not other items
Surprised that the poverty level is so high in New York. One might think that the number of people at the upper levels of wealth in the NYC metropolitan area would outweigh those living outside the city but evidently not?
I imagine much cheaper than NYC, especially cost of housing
That’s for sure true enough, Will Funk, but then again living just about anywhere — outside of CA at least — is less expensive than living in the city!
Rural NY with low cost of living
The lower the cost of living… the lower the wages.. The higher the poverty rate
Is living in upstate New York really all that “cheap”?
The states with the highest poverty rates also have low cost of living.
Income transfers, such as welfare, Section 8, etc., are not included to adjust poverty rates
That’s very interesting — did not know that — why not? — that is income as far as the recipient is concerned, is it not?
he Census Bureau tracks poverty rates per government.
Transfer payments are probably tracked by an other agency.
The two don’t meet